The words on the tips of the country's tongues all fall in the same direction. What happened to our cricket side over in our troubled neighbour's backyard? How did we not win that tournament? It wasn't merely due to one upset in a final that could go either way, it was a bad performance across the board. It is easy to merely make excuses, as South Africans we are great at doing that, and there are certain mitigating factors that will rest easy in the hearts of the public. However, it is better to give credit where credit is due, understand the context of the loss and move forward. Is South Africa simply a poor T20 side? The answer to this is probably no, but going into a tournament without your best T20 players is bound to have some effect. AB de Villiers is not only a shrewd limited overs captain, but probably the world's most versatile batsman in all forms of the game. With the ability to shift gears in an instant and tailor his play to almost any match situation, he is an integral part of the Proteas middle-order and his absence was glaring. With a few impotent performances from the middle-order, Faf Du Plessis was shifted further down than originally planned, as cover. Add to this the absence of Jacques Kallis, an IPL stalwart, and the batting order begins to wear thin.
With these two greats back in the team it gives Levi even more license to play his bullish game, and adds stability to the currently brittle top order. Amla's position is still in question for me, despite his lovely innings against Bangladesh. The Proteas batting was on the slow side, too quick to give their wickets away and they continually fell into simple traps. The middle-order was largely spineless. The only game in which these things came right was the first one against Bangladesh, but even a win here couldn't detract from the obvious problems in the bowling and fielding departments. With Wayne Parnell going for 61 in four overs against Bangladesh, the early-warning signals were there.
Throughout the tournament the South African bowling attack, although rotated, were listless and non-penetrating. Parnell took wickets but was typically expensive, as was Marchant De Lange. Lopsy struggled to take wickets, while the new kid on the block Chris Morris failed to impress besides for a tidy economy rate. Robin Petersen was good up until the final, where Masakadza and Taylor showed he can also be taken apart with a bit of application. The fielding was also well below-par for South African standards, with uncharacteristic dropped catches and fumbles making the task at hand all the more difficult.
The argument reverts back to the missing players. Dale Steyn is the world's premier fast bowler, another IPL veteran, and all that is needed is another glance at his over against Richard Levi earlier this year to show what he is capable of. Morne Morkel was another noted exclusion. His pace and awkward bounce would have made things a lot more difficult for batsman such as Hamilton Masakadza, and the 2012 IPL top wicket taker would be a dead cert in any international T20 team. My friends, these are not excuses. There was a method to this madness.
All the above mentioned exclusions came as a result of extended stints in the IPL. As we all know, this circus of a tournament is long and punishing, and in a cricket calender full to the brim, management of your best players is paramount. These guys needed and deserved the rest they were given, as there are more important engagements for the Proteas in the future where they will need their stars at 100% intensity. Imagine a jaded Dale Steyn running in against the English next month? An over-bowled Morne Morkel trundling in at first change? These game-changers need to be at their best when they are most needed, and an unofficial T20 warm-up tournament is not as high on the list of priorities as taking the number one test spot away from the English in their own backyard.
The team we fielded in the Tri-Series was experimental. It was designed to test combinations and fringe players and hopefully find some form for the players that gathered rust as the IPL moseyed along. The beatings (and there is no better word for it) we took at the hands of the minnows were more enlightening than they were worrying. For instance, it proved to me that Hashim Amla, no matter how glorious a batsman, still has a long way to go as a replacement captain. His decision making was predictable and his aggression non-existent. Understandably, he was thrust into the position after Johan Botha was ruled out with a knee injury, but he has captained sides before and is no stranger to leadership. It also proved to me that Colin Ingram has matured as a batsman and may be very important for South Africa in the limited form of the game, especially with age slowly getting the better of Jacques Kallis. It would've proved enlightening to the South African coaches and selectors, possibly more so than if the Proteas had done as well as the public expected of them.
It was mentioned earlier that credit must be given where credit is due, and it is no more applicable than in the case of Zimbabwe. They played some outstanding cricket which would've challenged most over-confident touring teams. The trick to Zimbabwe's success (which is really no trick at all) was getting runs at the top of the order. Sibanda and Masakadza made a potent opening partnership, with Brendan Taylor in sublime form at first drop. Easily the man of the tournament, Hamilton Masakadza batted imperiously, with controlled aggression, and with an average of 66.00 in his five matches, guided Zimbabwe's ship. When it was their turn to bowl, they came out firing to the best of their ability and gave 100% at all times. Their intensity brought a smile to my face; the importance they attributed to this tournament visible in all that they did.
As the Proteas showed when they beat Zimbabwe to make the final, if you get the top three out cheaply, the rest will follow. Zimbabwe relied on key players to win the tournament, but at the end of the day, that is what T20 cricket is all about. Getting runs on the board and a good effort in the field will bring more success than heartache. The South African public should not forget that the Proteas did make the final, and did beat both their competitors on the way in. However, this is a hollow consolation and the team should not be commended on things that they should be doing. The sloppy overthrows conceded in the 15th over of the final to gift Brendan Taylor his half century summed up the South African's tournament perfectly. But don't read too much into these losses ahead of the T20 World Cup. There are still three T20's against England with a full-strength team, which will be a better barometer to measure where we are before we visit Sri Lanka in September. Keep the faith.
Maverick White
Disagree with Maverick? Let us hear your thoughts. Please comment below.



Also nearly that entire Zim team stays in Zimbabwe during the IPL and in summer play their domestic league, all on those slow under-sub-continent pitches they seem to relish. Masakadza & Taylor have displayed some incredible timing there.
ReplyDeleteHome ground advantage will always go a long way in providing a certain edge, but the nature of the Zimbabwe pitches should not be used as an excuse. In Sri Lanka they will play on similar slower surfaces, and with a front foot bully such as Levi, should be making the most of them.
ReplyDeleteMasakadza and Taylor were exemplary in their approach to playing on that wicket, and Zimbabwe may well be someone to keep your eyes on for a sneaky bet on them making it through the group stages at the World Cup.