Tuesday, 10 July 2012

Quiet please: Artist At Work

As a man of passion, especially when it comes to sport, I often find myself at fault by jumping to conclusions rather hastily. I have and always will be someone who is driven by emotion, free of the clinical thinking that is often required from a man in my position. It is with that in mind that I decided to let Sunday’s proceedings sink in before drawing up a list of superlatives to throw at Roger Federer. After all it was an emotionally charged affair, which ended with a mass outpouring of tears on Centre Court that was beamed the world over. Now that the dust has settled it’s fair to say what we witnessed over those three hours, excluding an unnecessary rain-delay, was an artist at work.

It was not meant to be this way though. The stars had aligned, on the year of the Queen’s jubilee, Britain would finally have their first Wimbledon winner of the Open era. A pariah of sorts, Murray has often been ridiculed for his dour demeanor, but over the two weeks at SW19 he received unwavering support from the local crowd - quick to dust off the ol’ Union Jack and proclaim him as one of their own. That he is in fact Scottish seemed to be lost amongst the hype of Team GB and the upcoming Olympics. On Sunday though Murray spent much of his time staring up at the clouds, and later the roof, pleading with the gods as he attempted to win his first major title. It is hard to believe that he has yet to taste major glory, something that can only be contributed to the man on the other side of the net. A gangly figure, Murray lopes around the court like a young antelope, his play sometimes unsightly and at others quite breathtaking. The latter was on hand for all to see during the first set as he went toe-to-toe with the greatest in the cathedral of Centre Court. In his three previous major finals he had failed to pick up a set – on Sunday he did it at his first time of asking. Unfortunately that was as good as it would get for the wiry Scot, for it was the unflappable Swiss that then took centre stage.

Men’s tennis is in the throes of it’s finest generation, of that I have no doubt. As a student (and participant) of the game I often find myself in awe of what these players are currently capable of. Advances in technology, conditioning and weight training has pushed men’s tennis from a game of quickness and finesse into one of athleticism and brute power.  It is not the latter though that describes the finest exponent of the modern game, Roger Federer. “RF”  - as Nike have so cleverly branded him - is simply the most elegant player I have seen on the men’s circuit in my short but eventful life. He is a man so freakishly gifted and in control, that even at the heightened speeds of the modern game, he looks as if he is moving in slow-motion. It is this that sets him apart from the rest, for when he decides to accelerate he takes his game to someplace magical. You may be forgiven in thinking that this is an assessment of his physical prowess, but you’d be wrong. It is rather his unparalleled intelligence that allows him to forge those extra couple milliseconds, for when you’re playing Roger Federer, you are always two steps behind.

You only have to look at set-point in the second set to discern what I am talking about. The point was sealed with a delicious backhand sliced drop volley, but it was how he constructed that point that enabled him to play that sumptuous winner. After trading blows with Murray for 14 shots, Federer forced Murray wide with a crosscourt forehand that left his racket at an almost unimaginable angle, landing in only thanks to the ludicrous amount of spin that he had inflicted on the ball. Having played the game, these are moments are all the more intense as you attempt to fathom the impossibility of what you just saw him do. He then followed this up with a crosscourt backhand that had Murray scrambling across to the ad-side of the court. Murray, ever the scrapper, managed to slice a backhand back across the net, but it was to no avail as Federer followed the ball in and showed all the deftness of touch and finesse that we have come to expect from him and the set was his. The commentator, let out a chuckle of disbelief before proclaiming, “You’re joking me!”. Murray’s riposte was in a similar vein. It was at that moment that you knew that it was all but over for the plucky Scot.


The rain came, and the closing of the roof hammered a few more nails in Murray’s coffin. It was then that Federer shifted gears and really treated the partisan crowd to a masterclass. His ball striking moved up another level, as if that was even possible and his return of serve shadowed even Agassi for ruthless efficiency. As Murray wilted, Federer upped the ante, skipping around his backhand before unleashing thundering forehand after thundering forehand that had Murray on the flat of his back on numerous occasions. At 3-2 in the third they played out a 20 minute, 26 point game which Federer won with his sixth break point. Federer lost only five points on his serve in that set, with the dolphin like leap back in his step. The third set was headed only one way so Fed decided to enjoy himself, whipping out some quite exquisite shots that had Murray cursing the gods and perhaps even his own mother for having him 5 years too soon.

In the end as a Murray forehand drifted wide, you knew that you had just witnessed the greatest in action. Having matched “Pistol” Pete Sampras’ record at Wimbledon, he returns to the top of the world once again – but isn’t that where he’s always been? It’s well documented that he had gone two and a half years without a major trophy, but we forget how close he has been. Had it not been for a freakish return from Djokovic at last year’s US Open, he may have been even closer to 20 titles.

What followed took some of the attention away from Federer, but as is the measure of the man, I don’t think he was too bothered by it all. He had achieved what he set out to do, emulate his hero. The crowd, clearly disappointed with the result, begrudgingly offered their applause, if only to live up to courtesies expected at Wimbledon. Perhaps they, like myself, needed time to reflect on what they had just witnessed, true genius at work. They will of course get to witness it all again in 3 weeks as the Olympics come to town. A singles gold is one of the few accolades that continues to allude the Swiss maestro, but few would bet against him adding one to his already bulging resume, even as he approaches his 31st birthday. Come next Monday he will break Sampras’ record for most weeks atop the tennis pile, leaving us with no illusions as to his claim the title of “The Greatest”, but then again it was never really in doubt was it.

Commodore Vegas watches a lot of sport and then writes about it. It's a compulsion, and he needs help desperately. You can follow him on Twitter here. Or you could just leave your comments below and let him know what you think.

8 comments:

  1. Federer is super talented, pity he's such an arrogant twat. Modesty is the best policy, especially if you are shit hot!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I disagree wholeheartedly. Federer is one of the most humble, modest champions we have ever seen, although god knows he has every right to be arrogant because he is that damn good.

      Delete
    2. Federer arrogant??? I think he is quite the opposite actually. Well played Federer and well written Commodore.

      Delete
  2. I watched the whole match from start to finish, and just like the game against Bennetau - you can never write off the Swiss champ. I even had the thought of backing the Fed man when he was 1 set down, but didn't want to jinx what could be an incredible comeback. Some blame the roof being closed. Some blame Murray not being fit enough and being injury prone. But all in all, Federer was quite simply unplayable in those three sets he won. Hats off to "the greatest!"

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bloody Scotsman

    ReplyDelete
  4. Federer is over the hill. When Nadal breaks his record, and he will, then he'll be considered the greatest. C'mon Rafa!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well it's clear to see where your allegiances lie Uncle Toni, but I have my doubts about Nadal lasting as long as Roger.
      His game is built on physicality and brute force, it will eventually take it's toll on his body. I don't see him winning majors after the age of 30. I may be wrong, but more often than not, that isn't the case.

      Delete
  5. Murray has some serious mommy issues he needs to work through before he can win this one.

    ReplyDelete